Let’s talk about this market sell-off, and what is—and is not—going on here.
Since the start of February, the global equity markets have fallen 6%, losing all of its gains for the year as volatility soared. The most violent of moves occurred on Monday, February 5, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged 1,500 points intra-day and the S&P® 500® Index was down 4% to end the day, prompting worries that we are witnessing a “flash crash.”1
While this market action has been a bit “flashy,” it is nowhere near the degree of past flash crashes where severe market dislocations occurred. The magnitude of this week’s market moves can be partly explained by the coordinated unwinding of speculative positioning against a backdrop of anomalously low market volatility and euphoric sentiment.
The likely path forward for markets is positive given the stability of macroeconomic data, supportive global growth and positive earnings sentiment globally. However, given that 2018 could witness changes in both monetary and fiscal policy in the US and abroad, investors should expect more idiosyncratic episodic market volatility—a trend that is commonplace for a market in the later stages of a cycle.
Here are 3 key takeaways from this market sell-off:
Takeaway 1: Walking through the dust as it settles paints a picture of euphoric positioning
The equity markets sold off as a result of a myriad of factors from macro to sentiment to positioning. Heading into February the market was facing prior persistent trends of euphoric exuberance, partly a result of a noticeable boost in earnings estimates for 2018—the growth rate surged more than 5% to a projected 16.6% since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed.2
Charting euphoric investor sentiment
The chart below shows the Relative Strength Index (RSI), which tracks investor euphoria. RSI had traded over 70 for 18 consecutive days. This was the longest such streak in history. The RSI is now below 30, which indicates oversold.
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P., as of 2/6/2018
This euphoric sentiment was combined with a historically low starting point in levels of market volatility across multiple asset classes, leading to significant net long positioning in key exposures, such as equities and oil, combined with significant short positioning in interest rates and the US dollar. Sentiment and positioning were now at elevated levels.
A glimpse of significant net long positions
Our second chart, capturing futures positions, reinforces our belief that traders unwound long oil, long equity, short dollar (not shown here) and short interest rate positions. This sent rates on 10-year US Treasuries to 2.7%.
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P., as of 1/31/2018
Beyond the sentiment and the positioning that contributed to the exuberance, and likely the fall as well, the market was also bearing the brunt of the uptick in inflation expectations. This was a result of the tax reform bill that sent interest rates in the US to their highest level since 2014.3 These higher inflation expectations led the market to expect a more hawkish Federal Reserve (Fed) interest rate hike cycle, evidenced by the probability of a fourth rate-hike by December of 2018 increasing to over 20%. (This sentiment has since reversed course as the market sold off.)
Inflation expectations increased, pushing bond yields higher
This final chart shows that as investor expectations of inflation increased, so did interest rates. The takeaway is that historically low interest rates and inflation resulted in lofty stock valuations. Once they began increasing, investors were naturally re-rating valuations to reflect the new reality.
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P., as of 2/6/2018
Takeaway 2: ETFs helped, not hurt, during this selloff
There is a common refrain to blame ETFs for any market turbulence. I say this is #FakeNews.
Let’s look at the facts behind the recent selloff:4
For funds focused on the US equities in aggregate there was $11 billion of gross primary market activity (absolute value of creations/redemptions. This shows the activity where it would necessitate any impact at the stock level).
There was $340 billion of trading volume on the underlying stocks in the Russell 3000® Index.
Therefore, US Equity ETFs only traded 3.3% of overall trading volume in the underlying market!
So did ETFs broadly negatively impact the selloff? No. How can something that represents 3% of the market lead to the market falling more than 4% on a single day? ETFs performed their role as a market tool for price discovery, allowing investors to make capital allocation decisions in real time based on the market environment.
Given the headlines, I must address Exchange-Traded Products (ETPs) that short the CBOE Volatility Index® (the VIX®). Those exposures had an impact on the VIX futures market, but not the overall equity market. The VIX futures market impact was captured in post-market trading on Monday when the VIX increased 20 points—the largest absolute or percentage change ever. This VIX move was estimated to be a result of covering inverse ETP’s short future positions and adding to levered product’s long positions. Clients with holdings in these products witnessed their value plummet—underscoring why State Street Global Advisors does not offer these types of exposures, as it does not fit our ethos of responsible innovation.
Takeaway 3: This market selloff has created more opportunities for investors because of these four factors:
Valuations have come down off “frothy” highs. The S&P 500 Index forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio is now at 17 times, which is below the 25-year average.5
Earnings growth is strong. Fourth-quarter earnings growth is tracking up 13% year-over-year while sales growth is up 8%.6
Earnings sentiment is strong. Firms are beating sales estimates by 0.9%, which is more than four times the five-year average beat of 0.2%. At the same time, 69% of firms are beating on earnings per share, 79% are beating on sales and 59% are beating on both. This puts companies on track for the most beats since 2000.7
Global growth remains robust as the Eurozone is on track for the strongest growth since 2010. The IMF recently upgraded global growth forecasts by 0.2% to 3.9% for 2018 and 2019.8
Looking at the opportunities now, from a sector perspective, financials represent a potentially attractive opportunity based on value, growth, momentum and earnings sentiment. Overall, the key message is that while this sell-off and spike in market volatility is unsettling; remember that last year, 45 out of the 47 countries in the MSCI ACWI had positive returns.9 Even with this sell-off, the S&P 500 Index is up 18% over the past year.
As always, we’ll be watching closely as events unfold, so stay tuned to SPDR® Blog for our latest market insights.
The views and opinions expressed on the Blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policies, positions or opinions of the State Street Corporation. All content on the Blog is reported only as of its publication date, and users are responsible for setting their browser cache settings to ensure they are receiving the most up-to-date information.
Users may not post
Inappropriate, offensive or defamatory material
Promotional material for a particular member, firm or product
Testimonials about success or lack thereof with a particular investment service or offering
Material that is in violation of intellectual property rights of State Street or a third party or otherwise violates intellectual property laws
Political views or voting information
Information that is not related to the financial industry
Electronic spam, including repetitive posts of the same content
Confidential information about themselves, their company or their clients, or information related to client accounts, such as account numbers
Language that implies affiliation, sponsorship or endorsement by State Street
Industry regulatory guidelines require that State Street remove any comments that could be interpreted as an endorsement for or recommendation of State Street or SPDR ETFs or their financial products or services.
Comments and opinions posted by users are the responsibility of the person who posted them. State Street does not guarantee the accuracy of content posted by others, and such content does not represent the views of State Street.
Before commenting on the Blog, investment professionals are asked to ensure that commenting is permitted under their firm’s online and/or social media policies. State Street takes no responsibility for any violations of firm policies that may occur as a result of use of the Blog.
Blog users are asked to be considerate, respectful and friendly.